The Rise and Demise of UNG

The United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) has long been one of the most popular ETFs on the market. Known for its hefty volatility, this first generation commodity ETF invests in front-month futures for natural gas. But the reason why UNG is so well-known is not because it was among the first of the commodity ETFs, but because of its abysmal performance. UNG has been down as much as 98% since inception (prior its rally in the past few months) and has been forced to undergo multiple reverse splits just to stay open. That being said the fund still trades millions of times per day and always has a healthy asset base [for more natural gas news subscribe to our free newsletter].

The Demise

UNG debuted in April of 2007 to a relatively low response, trading just 5,200 times on its first day. But as time went on, the fund began gathering steam, and was soon cracking 10,000 and eventually cracking the 1,000,000 mark on July 24th, 2008 when the fund dropped roughly 5.5% in one day. As the recession continued to deepen, UNG fell hard. The fund’s historical high came on July 1st, 2008, when it finished out the day at $507.84 (note that this was well before the fund was ever forced to reverse split). From there, things were all downhill as this ETF fell face first into a deadly tailspin.

As natural gas prices took a hit, UNG got pummeled, earning its crown as one of the worst performing ETFs of all time. UNG found its bottom almost five years to the day from its inception, as the fund touched $14.25 on April 19th of this year. But since then, the fund has been on a tear, causing a number of investors to re-consider their positions in the fund and how they trade it [see also 25 Ways To Invest In Natural Gas].

The Rise

The past few months have watched this asset claw its way higher as temperatures around the country have risen. Searing heat has led to a much higher demand for gas-powered appliances and helped to alleviate some of the growing stockpiles. To better define just how hot it was, the government came out with data revealing that July 2012 was the hottest month in U.S. history. This caused natural gas prices to tack on nearly 70% over a three month period (despite plenty of volatility along the way). UNG itself jumped 55% during that same time period.

As such, a number of natural-gas based investments have performed exceptionally well, leading many to make bets on the industry. The only question that remains is how long this rally will last and if you will be able to time it properly. One of the most likable features of UNG is that it has the ability to be shorted and there are also options on the fund. With such an uncertain future for both natural gas and this ultra-popular trading vehicle, it would appear that options are the safest way to make a bet on the movements in UNG [see also Five ETFs to Ride the Natural Gas Rally].

Don’t forget to subscribe to our free daily commodity investing newsletter and follow us on Twitter @CommodityHQ.

Disclosure: No positions at time of writing.

This entry was posted in Actionable Ideas, Asset Allocation, Commodity ETFs, Energy, Natural Gas and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Commodity HQ is not an investment advisor, and any content published by Commodity HQ does not constitute individual investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities or investment assets. Read the full disclaimer here.

8 Responses to “The Rise and Demise of UNG”

  1. [...] There is perhaps no natural gas ETF more popular than US Commodity Funds’ UNG. With just under $1.1 billion in total assets under managements, this ETF is by far the largest to invest in natural gas: UNG’s portfolio is more than 15X larger than the next biggest competitor. In addition to its sheer size, the fund’s appeal comes from being one of the most liquid ETFs available on the market, trading over 10 million shares a day on average. Since UNG is comprised of natural gas futures contracts, however, it frequently exhibits high levels of volatility, as the commodity is known to make major swings in as little time as an hour [see also The Rise and Demise of UNG]. [...]

  2. Frank says:

    Mark – your opinion may be valid, it’s your opinion but it’s as valid as anyone’s and you will no doubt trade on it. But you need to get your point over in a decent manner.

  3. [...] Gas Fund, LP (NYSEARCA:UNG): The staple ETF for natural gas futures, UNG is among one of the most popular commodity ETFs in the world. The fund currently holds about $1.1 billion in assets and trades more than 10 million [...]

  4. [...] gouged the ETF this year. When you drag that chart out to five years, NG prices dip 54%, while UNG sinks 93%. Note that for a brief period in 2008 when natural gas enjoyed a bull run, UNG had actually [...]

  5. [...] When it comes to NG futures, few products (including the futures themselves) have more liquidity than this ETF. While it is not a good representation of the commodity over the long term, it is an effective [...]

  6. [...] is by far the most popular ETF offering exposure to this fossil fuel. But the fund has come under heavy fire in recent years, as its failure to accurately track NG over the long term has been a point of [...]

  7. [...] is by far the most popular ETF offering exposure to this fossil fuel. But the fund has come under heavy fire in recent years, as its failure to accurately track NG over the long term has been a point of [...]

  8. [...] is by far the most popular ETF offering exposure to this fossil fuel. But the fund has come under heavy fire in recent years, as its failure to accurately track NG over the long term has been a point of [...]

Leave a Reply to Which Natural Gas ETF Is Right For You? UNG vs. GASZ vs. GAZ | Commodity HQ

  • Subscribe

    • RSS Icon   Twitter Icon
    • Sign up for free today:
  • Search